The company was the subject of a worthless lawsuit over the length of.
Floor time bread subway.
It is not the first time subway s bread has been in the spotlight.
Subway s bread reportedly has a sugar content that 10 of the weight of flour used according to the judges ruling.
There is no dispute that the bread supplied by subway in its heated sandwiches has a sugar content of 10 percent of the weight of the flour included in the dough the judgment read.
Back in 2014 the chain faced controversy after it was revealed that its loaves contained azodicarbonamide a chemical used in shoe rubber and yoga mats.
In 2014 the company removed azodicarbonamide a flour whitening agent from all baked items on its menu after an online petition started gaining momentum.
In this case there is no dispute that the bread supplied by subway in its heated sandwiches has a sugar content of 10 of the weight of the flour included in.
This is not the first time subway has courted controversy for the ingredients it uses in its sandwiches.
In 2014 the company announced it was removing azodicarbonamide the so called yoga mat chemical from its rolls.
Or as the supreme court put it.
This is not the first time something like this has.
Still isn t the first time that the chain has been chewed out for the way it makes its bread.
Subway bread is not bread too sugary rules irish court.
So if subway s melty cheese meats and other.
This amount does not fit the statutory definition of bread.
The result for subway was well not good as news of the ruling spread more quickly than it takes to make a spicy italian with headlines saying things like irish court rules subway bread is not bread it s not the first time subway has had to defend its bread.
The sugar content of subway s bread is 10 of the weight of the flour and therefore according to the justices it cannot be considered bread.
A flour whitening.
It has to be different from foods like pastries that also use flour.